Why a CTO is the single most important C-Level in 2026?

Insight ยท May 7, 2026 ยท 2 min read

I'll say something that won't make me popular ๐Ÿ˜ฌ
๐Ÿ‘‰ ๐ˆ๐ง ๐Ÿ๐ŸŽ๐Ÿ๐Ÿ”, ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐“๐Ž ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ฅ๐ž ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐ข๐ฆ๐ฉ๐จ๐ซ๐ญ๐š๐ง๐ญ ๐ฌ๐ž๐š๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‚-๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ข๐ญ๐ž.

Not because the CEO, CFO, COO or CMO matter less. They don't. Every one of those roles is critical and I've worked with brilliant people in each. But no other C-level seat is being rewritten as fast and as fundamentally as the CTO's.

And ๐ฆ๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐š๐ง๐ข๐ž๐ฌ ๐ก๐š๐ฏ๐ž๐ง'๐ญ ๐ซ๐ž๐š๐ฅ๐ข๐ณ๐ž๐ ๐ข๐ญ ๐ฒ๐ž๐ญ ๐Ÿค”

Here's a quick test I'd use: walk into any engineering org today and ask three questions:
1๏ธโƒฃ Who decides what gets built this quarter?
2๏ธโƒฃ How does a feature go from idea to production without four handovers and two Jira migrations?
3๏ธโƒฃ What does "senior engineer" mean now that an AI can scaffold a service in twenty minutes?

๐Ÿ‘€ If the answers are pretty much the same from 2022, chances are that you're not only missing on AI, but extremely behind on engineering itself.

Engineering used to live mostly in the IDE, but now it's in the ๐จ๐ซ๐  ๐œ๐ก๐š๐ซ๐ญ, the ๐ซ๐ž๐ฏ๐ข๐ž๐ฐ ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐œ๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ and the ๐œ๐จ๐ง๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ฌ๐š๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง ๐›๐ž๐ญ๐ฐ๐ž๐ž๐ง ๐›๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ฌ๐ฌ, ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐๐ฎ๐œ๐ญ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ž๐ง๐ ๐ข๐ง๐ž๐ž๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ . And throwing Claude Code, Codex or Copilots at the old structure just makes a slow system generate code faster, which by the way, if you've ever debugged a 4 AM incident... believe me, now it's a way worser problem than the one you started with.

โ€ผ๏ธ ๐“๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฉ๐š๐ซ๐ญ ๐ˆ ๐ฌ๐ž๐ž ๐‚๐“๐Ž๐ฌ ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ๐ž๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ฆ๐š๐ญ๐ž: The job is no longer to pick the stack and distribute work. It's to redesign the operating model around teams that ship with AI ๐ข๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฅ๐จ๐จ๐ฉ, not ๐ง๐ž๐ฑ๐ญ ๐ญ๐จ ๐ข๐ญ. Most engineering leaders weren't hired for it and are going crazy!

The ones who do understand this shift are doing four things:
โ†’ They've stopped defending team boundaries that exist for historical reasons
โ†’ They treat code review, QA, and incident response as places where AI is ๐ก๐ž๐ฅ๐ ๐š๐œ๐œ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž, not just used
โ†’ They have an honest answer when the board asks "what's our AI strategy" and guess what: it's not a tool list
โ†’ They protect deep work in their org while the rest of the company runs in circles about agents

And that's why, in 2026, ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐‚๐“๐Ž ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ก๐ž ๐ฌ๐ž๐š๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐๐ž๐œ๐ข๐๐ž๐ฌ how a company can best perform in today's crazy world.

So here's the question: ๐ˆ๐ฌ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐‚๐“๐Ž ๐ซ๐ž๐๐ž๐ฌ๐ข๐ ๐ง๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ก๐จ๐ฐ ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ ๐œ๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐š๐ง๐ฒ ๐›๐ฎ๐ข๐ฅ๐๐ฌ ๐จ๐ซ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ญ ๐›๐ฎ๐ฒ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ญ๐จ๐จ๐ฅ๐ฌ ๐š๐ง๐ ๐ก๐จ๐ฉ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐ข๐ญ ๐ฐ๐จ๐ซ๐ค๐ฌ?

#CTO #Leadership #Engineering #AI #FutureOfWork #TechLeadership #ClaudeCode #Codex #Copilot

Bruno Bonando

Written by

Bruno Bonando

Fractional CTO and technology advisor. 23+ years shaping platforms for many companies across Europe and Latin America. Has had leadership roles at REWE, MediaMarktSaturn, Cazoo, and some others.

Insights

Thinking out loud

Perspectives on AI, architecture, and the evolving technology landscape.

Want to discuss this topic?

Get in touch โ†’